If you have ever seen the cops in movies and TV shows reading out people’s Miranda rights to them, the most obvious line that we can all remember is that if you are unable to afford your attorney, then the court of law will have to assign one to you since you happen to have the legal right to an attorney when you are facing any sort of charges. Now, some people get tempted and want to opt for the court-appointed attorney since it is free and is a good way to cut costs, but we strongly advise against it. Unless you absolutely cannot afford to have your lawyer, you should avoid the court-appointed one, especially when you are facing criminal charges. For more information, you can check out https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/90803-ca-gerald-nicholson-4735782.html.
Court-appointed attorneys are well-intentioned and are good at their job, but they are incredibly overworked. In a lot of instances, clients do not get to meet their attorney for longer than a few minutes since they have a huge caseload so they have to deal with their other clients too. This way it is very easy for them accidentally miss out on major details or holes in your case.
A personal criminal lawyer will have the time, resources, energy, and emotional bandwidth to give your case the attention it needs. This means holding multiple meetings with you, assigning other people for readings, and having the time to properly make a solid defense for you. Yes, they will cost money, and depending on your case, the cost can be high, but you will have the reassurance that your case is being given the time and attention it needs so that you get to have your day in court and are adequately represented and feel satisfied knowing you did your best.